The February board meeting is less about events and more about how our association functions. Several agenda items affect how information flows, how participation works, and how we structure long-term governance.

The January Board of Directors meeting covered a wide range of operational, governance, and committee matters. Several decisions made during the meeting affect how compliance actions begin, how and when members can participate during meetings, and how committee work will be scheduled and noticed going forward.

The membership section is actually very personal. It answers basic questions like: Who gets to vote?  Who can run for the board?  Who is officially a member of the association? That’s why we’re taking our time with it.

An overview of major topics surfaced at the planning meeting.

At the same time, community organizations are shaped not only by what they manage, but by how people interact within them. Events play a central role in that process. They create repeated, visible opportunities for neighbors to gather, observe norms, and learn what kinds of participation are possible.

Our purpose is to protect members, the Board, and the Association’s shared assets by ensuring our governing documents support predictable, fair, and workable processes in a volunteer-run community.

When members are told to step back and be quiet, the board doesn’t get to “do its work” more effectively — it just does it with less information, less trust, and less legitimacy.

When we demand how the work, it’s a signal that the issue isn’t procedural. It’s cultural. It’s distinction between support and compliance.

This site includes different kinds of writing, each with a specific purpose. Being clear about those purposes helps readers understand what they’re reading, how to use it, and where opinion and analysis fit. We don’t aim to sound neutral. We aim to be transparent.

At its core, HB 2118 limits an HOA’s ability to retroactively tighten use restrictions on homeowners without their consent. For Ken Lake, that touches several real and recurring areas of friction.

This meeting revisits how the board governs, not just what it decides.

This article prepares residents for the January Board meeting by explaining what the agenda items mean in practice, what authority exists, and what precedent or process has been used before.

This weekend, JOLT reported a proposed multifamily housing development at the corner of Black Lake Boulevard and 21st Avenue SW. We’re paying attention, and here’s what we know and what comes next.

Gowrylow stated “There is no zoning crisis, the city is not pulling a fast one on us as far as I can tell.” This is a stark contrast to Gowrylow's earlier position that the city upzoning would mean "crowded streets and parks."

I have opinions, and I’m not neutral about systems that reward exclusion or punish dissent. I write from lived experience, from documents and records, and from direct involvement in the community issues discussed here. I bring references not to posture as objective, but to show my work — so readers can trace how I arrive at my conclusions and decide for themselves whether those conclusions hold.

Interrupting a speaker during community comment is never neutral. It is a communication act — and it reveals who is allowed to define the story and who is not.

During the 2025 election season, SaveKenLake.com published a short set of posts to support campaign materials. These included candidate messages, a highlight piece about board work, and a fear-based piece titled “Why Ken Lake is in Danger.” The site has since been removed, but the archived posts help explain how the election narrative hardened and why it became difficult to correct.

The governance committee is recruiting members to work on it's subcommittees, making recommendations in direction as well as in the language that we will use to support each other for the next decade.

Covenant enforcement is a very big deal and can lead to large fines. It is important to respond to the board if you feel that an error was made, or if you need to request an extension. Learn more about Lakemoor Community Club covenants here. The Ken Lake LCC provides an appeal form, which can be filled out and returned to VIS at info@vismangement.com. Please complete this step promptly.

Unlike typical HOA communication or even standard political comparison, the letter focused almost entirely on character attacks toward one neighbor, naming him repeatedly across two pages and framing him as manipulative, dangerous, and personally responsible for a long list of perceived harms.